To philosophize effectively requires a balance of logic and creative-thinking, thinking of new links and ideas; founded on a logical basis (and supported by evidence).
Leonardo Da Vinci, being the obvious example, was hugely creative obviously and his ideas have been proven to be correct despite being three hundred years ahead of their time. Einstein with his spacetime theorum, Newton with his gravitational theory, are these not the results of creativity (among other things)? Their thinking may have their biases, but you cannot say they are woolly-thinkers, though they may be exceptions.
On what basis have you come to the conclusion that artistic types seem prone to woolly-thinking?




Reply With Quote


Bookmarks