Quote Originally Posted by ernst.filibert View Post
It is not possible to have a normal dialog with you people. Anyone who has a different opinion is discredited or personally attacked without valid counterarguments, only quasi arguments invented to justify your jihad against the person and the product.
You said that a respectable business man should sue you for your injury but who are you? Just a bunch of cowards hidden behind your nicknames.
I am out of here and leave you to bathe in your own misery.
Ernst, is it only me who suspects you could be more than one person? Have I detected a difference in your command of written English across different posts?

Oh well. Doesn't really matter. How's this for an insult?

You are a complete f'ing t**t unless you return and tell us what independently run, correctly controlled tests have shown any of the scam devices to work?

OR, Tell us why you think none of the people behind these scam devices will agree to proper independent testing?

OR, Tell us why you do not think they need to have such tests carried out?

Of course, you could also try to explain why Jim McCormick claimed that double blind testing would not work on these devices? That one has made me laugh (funny peculiar, not ha ha) ever since he spouted it.

So you see, you are only insulted here when you are unable to participate in a sensible, rational discussion, as opposed to your tactic of simply saying they do work and everyone involved are really well meaning, jolly nice, genuine types.

If you really have gone away (and that just tells us what we know already i.e. you have nothing to contribute) then I for one am happy you won't be polluting our forum with your nonsense any more. BUT, secretly I bet you are watching. EVIDENCE OR SILENCE!