Page 4 of 42 FirstFirst 1234567814 ... LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 624

Thread: Adrian Pengelly: Astonishing claims

  1. #46

    Re: Astonishing claims

    Quote Originally Posted by Small One. View Post
    However, one can get into trouble for saying too much online, and should be careful of what information is divulged and to whom.
    So don't allude to it if you can't or won't support it with facts. Saying that you "know things about him that would turn your hair blue" is an unsubstantiated claim, too vague to be defended against, but which nevertheless smears the person you are talking about. Don't do it if you can't back it up.
    "You got to use your brain." - McKinley Morganfield

    I keep getting this terrible feeling of deja woo.

  2. #47

    Re: Astonishing claims

    Quote Originally Posted by mattdleo View Post

    There are several references as Julia pointed out to this man being disliked. Poor bloke seems to constantly be under attack I wonder why? Sir Adrian with your super powers..........Get another job thats safer and involves less threats
    When you look at the psychology behind the man, and it is there for all to see in his "slick" pages ! he thinks at least half the world hates him but in all his testimonies, everyone mentions what a great chap he is, how kind he is, how funny he is, just like all his courses where they have so much fun and find him so amusing !
    Wise up you converts and look a little deeper ! Anyone who is so loved and adored has no need of arrogance or superiority or the constant need to be told.
    Or to constantly have to mention that superior fellow humans such as Doctors, Scientists and Vets have bowed to his superiority powers and knowledge. Take a look at a few points below which can be verified !!!!!!

    Quote"Alongside this passion was his love of archaeology and he worked for two years on the excavation of Dudley Castle in the West Midlands."
    \
    Hmm! since when did wheeling wheel barrows for real Archaeologists, whilst employed by ManPower Services qualify anyone for a degree ?, when exactly did he get this degree ? I understand Dudley Castle came shortly after a second failure to pass his Biology "A" level. So no straight from 6th form to Uni there !
    Quote"I graduated from Birmingham University. I was also a full-time cyclist for two years."
    Don't know how he fitted it all in with over 20 years healing, (according to one of his dodgy testimonies) a short (very short) career in the police force and then there was the time hespent working at public transport and planning when he claims Quote" I lived in France from March 1988 to September 1989. I lived in the Bordeaux area, and spent some time in Tours, too. I was riding my bicycle, and racing for a French team. I wanted to become a professional, and win the Tour de France!" how strange, his family friends and fellow work colleagues and cyclists have a very different story about where he was and what was happening in his life at that time ! his first child was born in April 1988 ? NOT IN FRANCE ! not the sort of thing you conveniently forget or lie about is it ?

    Pants well and truly on fire I think and not for the first time !
    If Adrian Pengelly tells you it is raining outside, go out there and get drenched before believing him !




  3. #48

    Re: Astonishing claims

    Quote Originally Posted by Trinoc View Post
    One minor point ... are we sure that the Adrian Pengelly we are discussing is the same one as the cyclist (with the knighthood) - not to mention the local government official, and any other occurrences of the name in Google? Pengelly isn't a particularly uncommon name, particularly in the south-west.
    It is the cyclist with the psuedo knighthood ! see his interview with the French Animal activist on his website. I'ts not the Caradon District Council guy.

  4. #49

    Re: Astonishing claims

    Quote Originally Posted by Tangleblossom View Post
    It is the cyclist with the psuedo knighthood ! see his interview with the French Animal activist on his website. I'ts not the Caradon District Council guy.
    OK, got that. Is there a web site somewhere which lists all valid knighthoods? Isn't there some sort of law against falsely claiming to be a "Sir".
    Be skeptical of the things you believe are false, but be very skeptical of the things you believe are true.

  5. #50

    Re: Astonishing claims

    Quote Originally Posted by Trinoc View Post
    OK, got that. Is there a web site somewhere which lists all valid knighthoods? Isn't there some sort of law against falsely claiming to be a "Sir".
    No anyone can buy one on ebay and for a couple of hundred quid you can get some very fancy paperwork to go with it, which is nothing more than fancy paperwork but why bother when you can change your name by depoll to anything you like for next to nothing ! being Sir Whatever courtesy of ebay or depoll is worth nothing more than being "Landlord of the Dog and Duck" apart from the Landlord of the Dog and Duck really is who he claims to be ! unless you have appeared in the honours or are the very direct descendent of a Baron, the Title Sir can not be bestowed. The clue there is DIRECT descendent ! not Sir Thomas Pengelly Baron of the exchequer who died in 1730 who Mr Pengelly claims to have got his title from, as that would make Mr Pengelly at least 279 years old.

  6. #51

    Re: Astonishing claims

    Quote Originally Posted by Trinoc View Post
    OK, got that. Is there a web site somewhere which lists all valid knighthoods ?
    Bourkes Peerage ! wont find im in there though ! nor any descendents of Baron Pengelly, he had none !

  7. #52

    Re: Astonishing claims

    Quote Originally Posted by Tangleblossom View Post
    Bourkes Peerage ! wont find im in there though ! nor any descendents of Baron Pengelly, he had none !
    I thought knights had to be explicitly knighted by Queen Liz. I don't think you automatically inherit a knighthood from an aristocratic family. Of course, lots of aristos get knighted for no apparent reason other than their aristocracy, but that's a different matter. My point is that if he is "Sir Adrian" in the real sense, he must surely have been officially knighted at some point, so surely that must be on record somewhere.
    Be skeptical of the things you believe are false, but be very skeptical of the things you believe are true.

  8. #53

    Re: Astonishing claims

    Quote Originally Posted by Trinoc View Post
    I thought knights had to be explicitly knighted by Queen Liz. I don't think you automatically inherit a knighthood from an aristocratic family. Of course, lots of aristos get knighted for no apparent reason other than their aristocracy, but that's a different matter. My point is that if he is "Sir Adrian" in the real sense, he must surely have been officially knighted at some point, so surely that must be on record somewhere.
    The point is he was never knighted, so there is no record, if you do an extensive google you will find a cyclists forum where Mr P boasts about how he got his "impossible" title where foolish people refer to him as their very own "knight of the realm" he actually claims to have been given this title which formerly belonged to Baron Pengelly ! Oh Yeah ! 279 years after the guy snuffed it ! There was once a very informative website belonging to Richard the Earl of Bradford called "Fake Titles .com" think it vanished as Richard himself, according to some, was up to shadey stuff lol ! but he really was the Earl of Bradford and very informative about such issues.

  9. #54
    Hero member polomint38's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    South East London
    Posts
    958

    Re: Astonishing claims

    Bourkes Peerage ! wont find im in there though ! nor any descendents of Baron Pengelly, he had none !
    I thought if you have no direct descendant, then the title moves to nearest relative (first cousins etc.)

    Also Sir Tangle of Blossom could you please use the quote facility, (highlight the text you want to quote and press the "speech bubble" icon), I am waiting for new glasses and realise more than ever that yellow text on white background is not very readable.

    Yours Skeptically,

    Sir Polo of Mint
    ______________________________

    You need an excuse? Just drink

    skbuncks

    her cheese slid off her cracker many moons ago

    floppit

  10. #55

    Re: Astonishing claims

    Also Sir Tangle of Blossom could you please use the quote facility, (highlight the text you want to quote and press the "speech bubble" icon), I am waiting for new glasses and realise more than ever that yellow text on white background is not very readable.

    Yours Skeptically,

    Sir Polo of Mint[/QUOTE]

    Sorry Sir Polo of Mint, It was copied and pasted from his own work.

    [QUOTE=polomint38;58794]I thought if you have no direct descendant, then the title moves to nearest relative (first cousins etc.)

    Not Knighthoods, the title "Sir" is only given by her Madge for the life of the title holder. Except !
    A Baron t(he lowest rank in true peerage) can hand the title of "Sir" to a direct descendant with their Baronial lands. The title then dies. Unlikely they hunted down Mr P to bestow a title on him 279 years later, as one would also assume Mr P has a father and Grandfather, Great Grandfather and Great Great Grandfather named Pengelly ?

  11. #56
    Hero member polomint38's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    South East London
    Posts
    958

    Re: Astonishing claims

    Quote Originally Posted by Tangleblossom View Post
    A Baron the lowest rank in true peerage) can hand the title of "Sir" to a direct descendant with their Baronial lands. The title then dies. Unlikely they hunted down Mr P to bestow a title on him 279 years later, as one would also assume Mr P has a father and Grandfather, Great Grandfather and Great Great Grandfather named Pengelly ?[/B]
    I was not suggesting that he was telling the truth. He is obviously a chancer and BS'er

    There seems to be a lot of contradictory information on the internet about what constitutes a baron and who can or can't inherit the title. Direct Descendant does not necessarily mean your own children.
    ______________________________

    You need an excuse? Just drink

    skbuncks

    her cheese slid off her cracker many moons ago

    floppit

  12. #57
    Hero member Julia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    York, England
    Posts
    1,015

    Re: Astonishing claims

    Hang on. Are we quite sure that the (Sir) Adrian Pengelly who posted on this forum:

    http://www.timetriallingforum.co.uk/...er&f=2&t=20003

    ...is the same person as Adrian Pengelly, International Healer? The Pengelly who contributed to that forum is a member of a leading cycle racing team, VC St Raphael.
    "If I get rid of the cancer and the person decides they don’t want treatment any more either they’re too busy, or they’re too mean with their money, or they just think they know better the cancer often comes back. And if it comes back, I can’t get rid of it a second time. My healing doesn’t work a second time."

    Adrian Pengelly

  13. #58

    Re: Astonishing claims

    Quote Originally Posted by MischiefMonkey View Post
    Why not?

    Do you think Dezza is the real deal?
    I just didnt want to offend anyone who does, or doesnt believe he is the real deal! I do have to admit he makes for some... "entertaining" viewing. Take that however you want to!

  14. #59

    Re: Astonishing claims

    Quote Originally Posted by polomint38 View Post
    I was not suggesting that he was telling the truth. He is obviously a chancer and BS'er

    There seems to be a lot of contradictory information on the internet about what constitutes a baron and who can or can't inherit the title. Direct Descendant does not necessarily mean your own children.
    You can even BUY these titles online now; we clubbed together and bought someone at work a title a few years back.

  15. #60

    Re: Astonishing claims

    Quote Originally Posted by Mojo View Post
    So don't allude to it if you can't or won't support it with facts. Saying that you "know things about him that would turn your hair blue" is an unsubstantiated claim, too vague to be defended against, but which nevertheless smears the person you are talking about. Don't do it if you can't back it up.
    Its strange how half the people are supportive of not saying too much, and the other half are pressuring for more information, if youre THAT desparate for it, seek it out via search engines! You cant SERIOUSLY want that much information that you would waste your time responding to someone who has stated from the start that they shall not be divulging any positive or negative information.

    Anyone could make a similar claim, a friend, a previous customer of his, a neighbour, a school chum, someone deeply interested in his work, someone who agrees with him, someone who does not agree with him, someone who has attended one of those classes he does. Anyone.

    I can indeed, back it up, I just don't want to on an online forum to strangers.

Similar Threads

  1. Astonishing idea....
    By bindeweede in forum Politics, Society Economics & Law
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 17th January 2010, 08:02 AM
  2. New claims of the paranormal?
    By Admin in forum General Paranormal.
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 15th August 2008, 10:01 AM
  3. Holistic Claims
    By Sgt Badass in forum Alternative medicine
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 15th June 2008, 11:27 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •