Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: High speed rail - not!

  1. #1

    High speed rail - not!

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/8003077.stm

    Why only 240 Km/h? Eurostar runs at 300 already and future lines planned in Europe will be at 350 and beyond. If you want to get people out of planes and on to trains you need end to end times between cities better than 3 hours (and 2 hours or less is best). I wonder if it's because Obama doesn't want source off the shelf kit from Europe or Japan?

  2. #2
    Hero member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Croydon 13013
    Posts
    2,184
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: High speed rail - not!

    Quote Originally Posted by Mulder View Post
    Why only 240 Km/h? Eurostar runs at 300 already
    Indeed. The reason that Eurostars don't run a bit faster is mainly quality of infrastructure and tightness of corners. You'd think that the US would have less of a problem running long straight lines so that only gives us the infrastructure as a reason for them to be so slow. American workmanship is probably your answer...
    'Croydon' Bob Newman. The ladies call him "Thrush" - as he's an irritating cunt.

  3. #3

    Re: High speed rail - not!

    I suspect they may not be building much new track. It isn't practical to fix existing track for high speed - look at the West Coast Main Line upgrade debacle. I suspect it would have been quicker, cheaper and certainly less disruptive to have built a new high speed line instead!

    The US plans are a wasted opportunity. If only they'd swallowed their pride and bought in European or Japanese expertise they could have had a great new system. Still the existing one is at least scenic!

    I just wonder if it's a disturbing sign of creeping protectionism.

  4. #4

    Re: High speed rail - not!

    How about a supertube ( underground train system). A balistic tube train that would travel at 500 miles an hour for intercontinental travelers. like the pneumatic capsuls that shops used to have.
    Seal the passengers in then fire them at a country they will be there in a matter of minutes, off course the mess will need to be cleaned all those mashed bodies before the next load can be sent.

  5. #5

    Re: High speed rail - not!

    Quote Originally Posted by lost thought View Post
    How about a supertube ( underground train system). A balistic tube train that would travel at 500 miles an hour for intercontinental travelers. like the pneumatic capsuls that shops used to have.
    Seal the passengers in then fire them at a country they will be there in a matter of minutes, off course the mess will need to be cleaned all those mashed bodies before the next load can be sent.
    Never heard of inertial dampers?

    (What do you mean, they don't exist?)
    Be skeptical of the things you believe are false, but be very skeptical of the things you believe are true.

Similar Threads

  1. Power-harvesting speed bumps?
    By tolman in forum Scams and Hoaxes
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11th December 2009, 05:35 PM
  2. Speed Kills?
    By ZERO in forum Science and Nature
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 22nd July 2008, 08:33 PM
  3. Hang him high!
    By median in forum Media: news, TV, radio.
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 17th June 2008, 08:18 PM
  4. Moses was high on drugs:
    By bindeweede in forum Religion/Atheism/Mysticism/Philosophy
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 11th April 2008, 10:23 PM
  5. Impossible !! : Constancy of Light Speed (to observer)
    By nakakayama in forum Pseudoscience
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 19th December 2007, 01:44 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •