Reply With QuoteJon so nice to see you here! Tell me do you still have mediums running your forum!Originally Posted by JonDonnis
In 2004 Uri Geller appeared on Greek TV, he displayed a range of his usual "psychic" abilities which the Greek audience lapped up.
Click Here To Watch
Jon so nice to see you here! Tell me do you still have mediums running your forum!
No, i finally saw sense and got rid of them.
Now there is myself, two sceptics and one fence sitter.
But no mediums!
Geller is the real deal
kindly tell me why you guys keep debunking him when he
has proven himself in the lab under scientific protocols ?
watch all links closely and before you even think
about commenting or offering lame excuses to explain
his successes at SRI away you better have done your
homework before replying.
http://www.remoteviewed.com/remote_v...tory_sri2.html
RV
So, how exactly would it be possible to debunk him if he had genuine powers?
I would suggest it is you who needs to do some homework.de·bunk(d-bngk)
tr.v. de·bunked, de·bunk·ing, de·bunks
To expose or ridicule the falseness, sham, or exaggerated claims of: debunk a supposed miracle drug.
Better sorry than safe.
Here's a good place to start R_V http://www.randi.org/uri/index.html
P.S. Here's some spare punctuation I had laying around, you obviously need it more than I do
.................................................. .................
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
;;;;;
:::::
Defendants might as well have said: Beneficent creatures from the 17th dimension use this bracelet as a beacon to locate people who need pain relief and whisk them off to their home world every night to provide help in ways unknown to our science.
Judge Frank Easterbrook commenting on the Q-Ray bracelet
"For Gods sake you're an American! Stop thinking of the consequences and blow something up" - Stan Smith, American Dad!
Well the SRI experiments were shown to be extremely sloppy and the names of Hal Puthoff and Russell Targ will always be used as examples of how not to investigate psychics.
If you intend taking remote viewing seriously (and it can be tested scientifically) I would suggest that you distance yourself from Geller and the SRI experiments. Both have been thoroughly discredited and no-one takes them seriously today.
Skeptics are always willing to look at new evidence - but it has to be credible evidence.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks