We look forward to the methods and results steveSeems a shame not to bring them here for open discussion.
My hunch is, if you used true-infrasound (IAV), then there will be no effect of it relative to appropriate baselines (shame about the double-blind). If you used higher-amplitude sound - then you may get effects - due to sound.
In addition, if you did not screen your participants (for perceptual thresholds via SDT or something similar) - the data could be more problematic for interpretation. In some cases the energy may have been audible - though not necessarily as clear sound....and may have led to more misattributions. This would still be using basic early sound-perception mechanisms though and so, would be no evidence at all for a special mechanism for true-infrasound (IAV). Just a thought......
![]()




Reply With Quote
....not for the first time these people show somewhat lax memories and self-perception.

Bookmarks